When are a 'crowded market' and earlier coexistence agreements relevant to trade mark infringement?
An appeal against a case which found no trade mark infringement or passing off in relation to polo trade marks has been unsuccessful.
When are a 'crowded market' and earlier coexistence agreements relevant to trade mark infringement?
When is an interim injunction justified?
Why were AGA’s trade marks infringed by retrofitted products?
Why were the Builder trade marks revoked?
Why must Alaska keep paying licence fees despite Virgin de-branding?