Confidential information – which can include databases, sales figures, spreadsheets – is often an extremely valuable part of modern business. It can be critical in giving a competitive advantage. Consequently, it’s not surprising that disputes concerning its alleged misuse are often complex and hard fought, especially when they involve companies that were previously business partners. That was the case in recent litigation between two motor insurance providers, in which Sir A

The Court of Appeal has reviewed the law on liability and account of profits in a judgment concerning the BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB trade mark (Lifestyle Equities C.V. & Anor v Ahmed & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 675). The case is one of many that are winding their way through the courts concerning this brand. In this litigation, the judge at first instance found that the use of SANTA MONICA POLO CLUB infringed the BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB mark and devices, and also found passing off.

This was the question that Mr Justice Michael Green wrestled with in his judgment in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor v Amazon UK Services Ld & Ors [2021] EWHC 118 (Ch). The case involved trade mark infringement and passing off claims brought against Amazon regarding the sale of goods bearing the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade marks on amazon.com. The claimants are familiar faces in the English High Court. They own trade marks for Beverly Hills Polo Club in the UK but not in the U